Comments on: Resolver/synchro feedback support in the next FW http://openservodrive.com/resolversynchro-feedback-support-next-fw/ Cutting edge without Bleeding edge Thu, 15 May 2025 12:21:32 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.12 By: uk payday http://openservodrive.com/resolversynchro-feedback-support-next-fw/#comment-407 Tue, 11 Feb 2014 06:03:58 +0000 http://openservodrive.com/?p=921#comment-407 payday loan uk
Please let me know if you’re looking for a article author for your weblog.
You have some really great articles and I think I would be a good asset.
If you ever want to take some of the load off, I’d absolutely
love to write some content for your blog in exchange for a link back
to mine. Please blast me an email if interested. Many thanks!

]]> By: Tero http://openservodrive.com/resolversynchro-feedback-support-next-fw/#comment-376 Wed, 13 Nov 2013 11:11:24 +0000 http://openservodrive.com/?p=921#comment-376 8192 is “counts per revolution” so it equals the real resolution after 4x if it would be an encoder.

8192 is based on analog noise limit. It could be much higher as well but it would not provide any real benefit due to analog signal noise.

]]> By: Johann http://openservodrive.com/resolversynchro-feedback-support-next-fw/#comment-375 Wed, 13 Nov 2013 08:31:55 +0000 http://openservodrive.com/?p=921#comment-375 hi tero
when you talk about 8192 pulse per revolution for maximum resolusion
this is reported for a single encoder A or B, or counting the number of signals after decoding quadrature x4

example: for a Heidenhain encoder 1000 ppr
there are 1000 pulse turns on the signal A and 1000 for B
with quadrature decoding software count is multiplied by 4
This position gives 4000 rpm

the 8192 counts it is befor or after quadrature decoding ?

]]>