<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IONI now measures motor resistance and inductance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/</link>
	<description>Cutting edge without Bleeding edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tero</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/#comment-2896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2015 17:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1519#comment-2896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good to hear your feedback :)

We start syncing IONI features to Argon FW starting from the next release, but no dates yet when everything is done. BTW, today we started implementing the Sin/Cos encoder support which will come to both drives pretty soon when it&#039;s ready.

How much the value inductance changes depending on angle? If its ~10% or less, then it&#039;s close enough anyways. No need to be more accurate.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good to hear your feedback :)</p>
<p>We start syncing IONI features to Argon FW starting from the next release, but no dates yet when everything is done. BTW, today we started implementing the Sin/Cos encoder support which will come to both drives pretty soon when it&#8217;s ready.</p>
<p>How much the value inductance changes depending on angle? If its ~10% or less, then it&#8217;s close enough anyways. No need to be more accurate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weerasak</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Weerasak]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 13:24:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1519#comment-2890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, I need to throw my RLC meter away.
 
Can you transfer this feature to Argon?

BTW, I noticed that during measurement of inductance with L meter, if I turn motor&#039;s shaft in different angle and measure, it will give you different value also. 

The question is which value is correct for ML parameter, among highest, lowest or average value.

Weerasak
www.CNCRoom.com/forum]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I need to throw my RLC meter away.</p>
<p>Can you transfer this feature to Argon?</p>
<p>BTW, I noticed that during measurement of inductance with L meter, if I turn motor&#8217;s shaft in different angle and measure, it will give you different value also. </p>
<p>The question is which value is correct for ML parameter, among highest, lowest or average value.</p>
<p>Weerasak<br />
<a href="http://www.CNCRoom.com/forum" rel="nofollow">http://www.CNCRoom.com/forum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tero</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tero]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2015 12:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1519#comment-2889</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cables affect to the result and it should because drive sees them together anyways. So including them in the values gives better torque tuning.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cables affect to the result and it should because drive sees them together anyways. So including them in the values gives better torque tuning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/#comment-2885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2015 20:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1519#comment-2885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So it does measure the resistance and inductance of the cables as well? However measured values are pretty close to data sheet values for my motor. Think that is good :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So it does measure the resistance and inductance of the cables as well? However measured values are pretty close to data sheet values for my motor. Think that is good :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jan</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/measure-motor-inductance-resistance-automatically-in-drive/#comment-2874</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2015 23:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1519#comment-2874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very cool!!

Thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very cool!!</p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
