<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Maximizing the bandwidth of Torque Control</title>
	<atom:link href="http://openservodrive.com/maximizing-bandwidth-torque-control/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://openservodrive.com/maximizing-bandwidth-torque-control/</link>
	<description>Cutting edge without Bleeding edge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 12:21:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=4.1.12</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/maximizing-bandwidth-torque-control/#comment-2637</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 09:47:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1374#comment-2637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I love seeing all this fine tuning, and brilliant finish touches.
I know how much work can go into some seemingly small thing like this, it is appreciated.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love seeing all this fine tuning, and brilliant finish touches.<br />
I know how much work can go into some seemingly small thing like this, it is appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lubchi</title>
		<link>http://openservodrive.com/maximizing-bandwidth-torque-control/#comment-2623</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lubchi]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2015 11:31:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://openservodrive.com/?p=1374#comment-2623</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi fellows,

that&#039;s great. Really clever and yes - it increases dynamics significantly. Just for example  - when I&#039;ve started with VSD-E some years ago I&#039;ve made a test with the same motor using once the VSD-E and then a Hi-End servo driver from a fabulous European company. The test was pretty simple - rotate the motor at max. speed (3000 rpm) in positive direction, then without any ramp with &quot;infinite&quot; acceleration, turn it in opposite direction - there is a jump in the speed setpoint of 6000 rpm. The result was: 11 ms for VSD-E against 14 ms for the other drive. The main reason: VSD-E has a current loop resp. delay of 50 us (20 KHz PWM), the other drive - 62.5 us (16 KHz). 
3 ms aren&#039;t much, but that&#039;s why we have chosen the &quot;unknown&quot; VSD-E for this project. The main task there was to realize 8 positionings/second, each one about 1/2 revolution. It works.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi fellows,</p>
<p>that&#8217;s great. Really clever and yes &#8211; it increases dynamics significantly. Just for example  &#8211; when I&#8217;ve started with VSD-E some years ago I&#8217;ve made a test with the same motor using once the VSD-E and then a Hi-End servo driver from a fabulous European company. The test was pretty simple &#8211; rotate the motor at max. speed (3000 rpm) in positive direction, then without any ramp with &#8220;infinite&#8221; acceleration, turn it in opposite direction &#8211; there is a jump in the speed setpoint of 6000 rpm. The result was: 11 ms for VSD-E against 14 ms for the other drive. The main reason: VSD-E has a current loop resp. delay of 50 us (20 KHz PWM), the other drive &#8211; 62.5 us (16 KHz).<br />
3 ms aren&#8217;t much, but that&#8217;s why we have chosen the &#8220;unknown&#8221; VSD-E for this project. The main task there was to realize 8 positionings/second, each one about 1/2 revolution. It works.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
